Musk’s chip diversion raises concerns over Tesla’s A.I. ambitions

Estimated read time 2 min read

A | a-+=

In the realm of ambitious billionaires, Elon Musk stands out, not just for his knack for innovation, but also for his audacious claims. Recently, Musk declared that Tesla would morph into a “leader in AI & robotics,” an ambitious vision hinging on a significant investment in Nvidia’s high-end processors. This bold statement, however, seems to be entangled in a web of internal conflicts and resource diversions, raising eyebrows among shareholders and tech enthusiasts alike.

On Tesla’s first-quarter earnings call, Musk painted a rosy picture of Tesla’s future, announcing plans to increase their use of Nvidia’s H100 AI chips from 35,000 to 85,000 by year’s end. He also declared on X about a hefty $10 billion investment in AI infrastructure. But emails from Nvidia insiders suggest a different story. It appears Musk has been redirecting a substantial portion of these coveted chips from Tesla to his social media company, X, potentially delaying Tesla’s AI ambitions.

This revelation has led to a stir among Tesla’s shareholders, who are now questioning Musk’s commitment to the electric vehicle giant amidst his numerous ventures. Tesla’s stock dipped by 1% following the news, reflecting the market’s unease. The Nvidia memos indicate that Musk’s maneuver pushed back Tesla’s GPU deliveries worth over $500 million by several months, likely stalling the company’s AI development projects crucial for autonomous driving and robotics.

Elon Musk’s multitasking approach, while impressive, seems to be spreading him thin across his various enterprises, from SpaceX to Neuralink, The Boring Company, X, and the recent addition of xAI. This intermingling of resources and priorities, particularly the diversion of critical AI chips, showcases a potential conflict of interest that could undermine Tesla’s progress. As Musk continues to juggle these high-stakes ventures, the onus is on him to prove that his grand visions can align without sacrificing the momentum of any single endeavor.

(Source: The Economic Times | Barron’s)

You May Also Like