Uber and Lyft face trial over driver classification in Massachusetts

Estimated read time 2 min read

A | a-+=

Uber and Lyft are preparing for a pivotal trial on Monday, where they face allegations from Massachusetts’ attorney general that they have misclassified their drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. This legal battle is part of a broader landscape of disputes in Massachusetts and across the U.S. regarding the employment status of gig workers, who play a crucial role in the economy.

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell is leading the charge, seeking to establish that Uber and Lyft drivers should be classified as employees under state law. This classification would grant drivers benefits such as a minimum wage, overtime pay, and earned sick time, which are currently not provided to them.

Uber and Lyft have defended their classification of drivers, arguing that they are technology companies that connect drivers with riders through their apps, rather than traditional transportation companies that employ drivers directly. They warn that a ruling against them could jeopardize their ability to maintain their flexible business models in the state, potentially leading to operational cutbacks or even shutdowns in Massachusetts.

The trial comes on the heels of a recent hearing in Massachusetts’ highest court regarding a ballot measure that could impact how drivers are classified. This measure, supported by the industry, defines drivers as contractors but offers them some additional benefits. The court seemed inclined to allow this proposal to appear on the ballot, alongside a competing measure supported by labor groups that aims to grant drivers the right to unionize.

The lawsuit, initiated in 2020 by Campbell’s predecessor, Maura Healey, who is now the state’s governor, carries significant implications. If the state prevails, Uber and Lyft could face substantial penalties for their classification practices. A report by the state auditor suggests that by classifying drivers as independent contractors, the companies avoided paying hundreds of millions of dollars into workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and paid family medical leave over a decade.

As the trial unfolds, it will be closely watched as a potential bellwether for the future of gig work and the broader gig economy, with implications that could extend far beyond Massachusetts.

(Source: CNN | Seeking Alpha | Reuters)

You May Also Like